24 replies to this topic

[santhire]

which is best in these and why?
Sony ericsson
Samsung
Nokia


Please suggest....

Edited by santhire, 13 January 2012 - 12:11 PM.

[Boysie]

Topic moved

[YB-)]

What kinda mobiles? Feature, basic or smart phs.
In my point of view in the feature phs. SE is very best. Because of modding section. We can design our phs through modding.

[r6680jc]

None of them.

[CegaW]

Sony Ericsson.. Because you askin' "in Sony Ericsson" forum..  

[Boysie]

santhire, on 13 January 2012 - 12:10 PM, said:

which is best in these and why?
Sony ericsson
Samsung
Nokia


Please suggest....

Impossible to say which is best. All the manufacturers have their own individual strengths and weaknesses.

[YB-)]

r6680jc, on 13 January 2012 - 12:18 PM, said:

None of them.

[Boysie]

He's correct. Read my post above.

[YB-)]

Yes. It may be upto the user. If the ph satisfies him, then thats the best ph for him.

[lovelyrathimukesh]

santhire, on 13 January 2012 - 12:10 PM, said:

which is best in these and why?
Sony ericsson
Samsung
Nokia


Please suggest....

I think se is the best option because me and my lots of friends use all but they satisfied with se features like

model design and looks

mooding cam, sound, graphic etc.

battery quality and hardware performance

and more

[CegaW]

lovelyrathimukesh, on 13 January 2012 - 03:10 PM, said:

and more

SE featurephones are the best than nokia and samsung's featurephone I think.. I love its multitasking..

But for smartphones I will give a rank.. Based on my opinion..
1. Samsung
2. SE (Sony)
3. Nokia (symbian)
not tested Wp7 yet.. :/

[REDHOTIRON2004]

santhire, on 13 January 2012 - 12:10 PM, said:

which is best in these and why?
Sony ericsson
Samsung
Nokia


Please suggest....

According to me:
SE is best in 'Feature Phone' department.
SE should be your choice if 'Music' & 'Camera' are a priority for you. And be ready to pay a premium for having a SE phone specially (Androids).
Though 'Hardware quality' is generally not the best out there.

Select 'Nokia', if hardware quality & ruggedness are a priority for you. Though software that they use weather it's S40(not even worth considering) or 'Symbian S60' both are obsolete. Windows phones that they have released are priced too highly. And what kind of support & adaptability it would have is yet to be seen. At present, I would recommend to avoid 'Nokia' mobiles because they are on a verge of change. And they don't release 'Androids'.

Out of the lot. Samsung seems to be offering the best with respect to 'Value for money'. There android mobile range is so large that you would definitely find one that suits your requirement in your budget. Software & hardware are both good. And these guys are also pretty serious about the software updates at regular intervals for the longest time for there range of mobile phones.

[omide]

i've got a question : out of all the smartphones out there,wich big manufacturers stand aside from the iphone design?
i can't be really objective,'cause i only have sony ericsson phones but there isn't a "best phone or manufacturer" out there.if we consider reasons like hardware tops,the winner must be a samsung phone,if we consider performance and snobbery(because it's the most expensive) at any level,the winner is a apple phone and if we consider design ,only a few remain original and these are sony ericsson,nokia and htc in any order you want them to be

Edited by omide, 13 January 2012 - 03:44 PM.

[santhire]

se is almost near to iphone in every point of view (in graphics and all)....
no other manufacturer competate sony eicsson...
se has its own style......

may i know is it possible to change graphics, layout and all in other phones like how we do in se......

[shapeshifter]

REDHOTIRON2004, on 13 January 2012 - 03:35 PM, said:

these guys are also pretty serious about the software updates at regular intervals for the longest time for there range of mobile phones.

disagree
and do you think galaxy ace is 'value for money' ?
no, most of samsungs are not, except few high end like S2, nexus and note

[omide]

well yeah it is possible,you just don't know it.you want proof that other pghones can be modified like se?
here is a just one link
http://www.mylgcooki...b84929f3935;www

[santhire]

you can keep se as you like.....
each and everything can be cganged as you like except one or two...

Edited by santhire, 13 January 2012 - 04:41 PM.

[REDHOTIRON2004]

shapeshifter, on 13 January 2012 - 04:27 PM, said:

disagree
and do you think galaxy ace is 'value for money' ?
no, most of samsungs are not, except few high end like S2, nexus and note

All these companies (Nokia, Samsung, Sony) offer a huge number of mobile phones.
As such any statement made is only on a general basis. 1 or 2 mobiles(such as Ace) can't represent the whole range of there mobile phones. Specially, considering that every mobile is made keeping in view a specific market & cater to specific people/needs.

Have a look at 'Samsung' android range of mobile phones in under 10k,15k,20k.
No other mobile maker is offering so much range. Sony's are launching mobiles that have no distinction at all. Specially, in respect of specifications & price points(no-sense & ridiculous).
Take for eg- W8 & X8. Active & Neo etc.
They seem to be launching mobiles just for the sake of launching.
And more shocking is the fact. That, the speed with which they are launching these mobiles. They are increasingly becoming reluctant in updating there mobiles & leave them halfway. Eg Xperia X10. X10 Mini/Pro.
Generally, it's also a well known fact that they are extremely late in launching updates. For eg- just have a look at there android updates & you would know what I mean.

[shapeshifter]

REDHOTIRON2004, on 13 January 2012 - 04:45 PM, said:

All these companies (Nokia, Samsung, Sony) offer a huge number of mobile phones.
As such any statement made is only on a general basis. 1 or 2 mobiles(such as Ace) can't represent the whole range of there mobile phones. Specially, considering that every mobile is made keeping in view a specific market & cater to specific people/needs.

Have a look at 'Samsung' android range of mobile phones in under 10k,15k,20k.
No other mobile maker is offering so much range. Sony's are launching mobiles that have no distinction at all. Specially, in respect of specifications & price points(no-sense & ridiculous).
Take for eg- W8 & X8. Active & Neo etc.
They seem to be launching mobiles just for the sake of launching.
And more shocking is the fact. That, the speed with which they are launching these mobiles. They are increasingly becoming reluctant in updating there mobiles & leave them halfway. Eg Xperia X10. X10 Mini/Pro.
Generally, it's also a well known fact that they are extremely late in launching updates. For eg- just have a look at there android updates & you would know what I mean.

xperia mini (specs) > galaxy ace (specs)
price of both = 13K, xperia mini is getting ICS and ace is not
neo specs = galaxy s specs, galaxy s not getting ICS while neo V is and neo V price < galaxy S price
I'm not a typical SE fanboy but their products are value for money and reliable.
and I dont know what you are trying to prove without research

REDHOTIRON2004, on 13 January 2012 - 04:45 PM, said:

They are increasingly becoming reluctant in updating there mobiles & leave them halfway. Eg Xperia X10. X10 Mini/Pro.
Generally, it's also a well known fact that they are extremely late in launching updates. For eg- just have a look at there android updates & you would know what I mean.

do you really think 600 mhz processor and such low RAM can run GB and ICS?
yes they can, but ask from those who are running gingerbread on x10 mini/pro, it kills multitasking on phones and fills all the ram without any bloatware running

[REDHOTIRON2004]

shapeshifter, on 13 January 2012 - 05:03 PM, said:

xperia mini (specs) > galaxy ace (specs)
price of both = 13K, xperia mini is getting ICS and ace is not
neo specs = galaxy s specs, galaxy s not getting ICS while neo V is and neo V price < galaxy S price
I'm not a typical SE fanboy but their products are value for money and reliable.
and I dont know what you are trying to prove without research

I too am not a 'Samsung' Fanboy!
But, I am very well researched!!! Did you know......
Sony Xperia pure was for Rs +30K & you think they are value for money!!!! You got to be kidding me !

Quote

do you really think 600 mhz processor and such low RAM can run GB and ICS?
yes they can, but ask from those who are running gingerbread on x10 mini/pro, it kills multitasking on phones and fills all the ram without any bloatware running

But, I know 1 thing. Once, I have bought a mobile, I won't pay another 15K Rs for software update which would allow me to record 720p Hd video instead of 'VGA' recording. Or, for having a 'Bravia' engine instead of regular LCD Software engine that we got !!! (Xperia X10mini vs Xperia Mini)